Last year, the Federal Government
approved the research for the Nitrogen-use-efficiency,
water-use-efficiency and salt tolerant (NEWEST) rice variety project at
the National Cereal Research Institute (NCRI), Badeggi, Niger State as
part of the overall strategy to end rice importation by 2017 and promote
food security in the country
Government’s decision was based on the
fact that farmers in the country and across Africa are experiencing low
yields resulting in high rice imports in SSA where over 40 per cent of
the rice consumed is imported. The average grain yield in Africa (2.2
t/ha) is below the world average (3.4 t/ha) by 49 per cent and several
factors account for this low yield.
Soil nitrogen deficiency has been cited
as a major constraint to rice production. Nitrogen deficiency is mostly
acute in the highly weathered upland areas where an average yield of
only one tonne per hectare, which is about 25 per cent of yield
potential, has been recorded. Also, nitrogen is difficult to retain when
applied in lowland areas due to floods and flowing water that
characterise such areas.
A major concern that constraints rice
production in nitrogen deficient soils is the inability of farmers to
buy fertilisers to address this constraint, and when they buy, they can
hardly afford the required rate for optimal yield. Improving the
nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of rice is one means of overcoming these
limitations.
Similarly, drought has been identified
as a major limiting factor in rice production in SSA where about 80 per
cent of rice farms traditionally depend on rainfall. The farmers are
often resource constrained, and cannot afford irrigation systems. With
the utilisation and application of water use efficient (WUE) component,
the rice will require less water and this will offer an appreciable
coping mechanism against drought.
Also, high salinity is increasingly becoming a major problem in rice growing areas of the coastal lowlands and mangrove swamps.
So principally, the ongoing rice
research at Badeggi is to address the above stated constraints which
over the years, conventional breeding methods have not been able to
tackle.
The editorial has raised questions on
the absence of the critical mass of qualified scientists to undertake
genetic engineering as well as their ability to handle such high level
technology.
But the question to ask is whether
genetic modification is more of a high level science than stem cell or
other form of science that researchers at Nigerian universities have
attained accolade and honour for their works in such areas.
Yes it is right to say Nigeria is not
like America that is so versed in research but that was the same kind of
argument presented when Nigeria ventured into nuclear technology, a
technology that one accident can kill every living thing within certain
radius, but 10 years after we have forged on and their fears have not
come to pass.
What were the nation’s manpower
potentials when our first satellite, NigeriaSat 1 was launched? We all
remembered that after the launch, Nigerian scientists were able to
build, launch and control NigeriaSat X in orbit.
The Guardian can send its reporters to
the research centres across Nigeria and investigate their capacity. It
is denigrating to question the patriotism of loyal and dedicated
researchers who in view of all odds have not only continue to thrive but
challenge and contest all honours and awards with their counterparts in
other parts of the world.
The good thing about science and
technology be it GM, nuclear or satellite is that, it is universal. Yes
agreed that we may not have all the facilities but that does not mean we
should not do what we can with what we have.
The Director-General of the National
Biosafety Management Agency (NBMA), Dr. Rufus Ebegba did not threaten to
shut the research institute if it fails the next round of preliminary
trials, because he does not have such powers. He can only stop the
research which is just one of the many researches the institute is
undertaking.
Ebegba did not say the statement below
attributed to him. “GMO rice is a strain that has been modified
genetically to increase micronutrients like vitamin A, accelerate
photosynthesis, resist pests, tolerate herbicides, increase grain size,
generate nutrients or flavours and produce human proteins.”
Your editorial also raised so many
questions including: Is such genetically modified rice, therefore, safe,
since the modification already alters its composition? Like irradiated
food, that doesn’t expire, the question is whether such product is still
safe for human consumption. How long then would the rice last? Or would
it last forever? Are GMO products biodegradable? These are critical
questions that should be answered.
These questions may not even arise if we
understand what the NEWEST rice is all about but for the avoidance of
doubt, it has nothing to do with the fears expressed as it won’t differ
from the rice in the market currently. The only difference is that its
genetic composition is altered to accommodate or withstand drought, high
soil salinity, Nitrogen deficiency among others.
There is no possibility of horizontal
gene transfer and it is not possible for gene transfer between rice and
millet as the editorial noted.
The fears about altering the natural
process of degradation does not even arise as before a GMO product is
released it must meet health, environment, ecology and other standards
which are observed worldwide.
Nobody has ever said that GM will solve
Nigeria’s food problem, emphasis had also been on the fact that GM is a
tool that can assist in the provision of safe and healthy food for
Nigerians.
The statement on whether Nigeria is
prepared to do the necessary research as far as genetic modification is
concerned can only be postulated by someone who lacks basic knowledge of
the human capacities in our research institutes. The GM beans project
had progressed successfully in the last 10 years in the country under
the supervision of Nigerians scientists at the Institute for Agriculture
Research, ABU, Zaria. The introduction of genetic engineering may be
one of the antidotes capable of reviving most of the research institutes
said to be comatose.
The essence of the whole exercise was
reinforced by the former Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Science
and Technology, Mrs. Winifred Oyo Ita at the inauguration of the
research that “the main role of science in agriculture has been to help
generate novelties that allow us to produce more with less land and less
effort”.
Abutu is of the Programme for Biosafety System.Abutu is of the Programme for Biosafety System.
No comments:
Post a Comment